Pages

Thursday, October 31, 2013

$7 Million for Phaneuf a Fair Deal

dion phaneuf leafs contract
After signing Phil Kessel to a franchise record 8-year, $64 million contract to start the season, the next most important item for Dave Nonis is deciding what to do with Dion Phaneuf. If he decides to sign the soon-to-be free agent, it won't be cheap.


Pierre Lebrun said he doesn't think "the Leafs are comfortable going north of $7 million." As for term, Lebrun added, "I would suspect that Newport Sports Management would start at eight years and that the Leafs would be more comfortable at six."

So Kypreos' tweet is largely confirmed, although it sounds more like "where it starts" would apply more so if Phaneuf made it to free agency without a contract, because if the Leafs aren't comfortable going north of $7 million and much longer than six years, then $50 million over seven years is more of a starting point for Phaneuf's camp, not Toronto's. Ultimately, $7 million a year over seven years probably sounds about right.

There's definitely some sticker shock to giving Phaneuf a $500,000 raise per season, just like some balked at the $8 million figure Kessel received. Many who will take issue with Phaneuf getting a deal of this size will point out that only four defencemen make $7 million or more—Shea Weber, Ryan Suter, Brian Campbell, and Drew Doughty. Zdeno Chara, probably the best defenceman of this generation, doesn't even make $7 million a season.

Referencing these contracts without any context isn't a fair comparison, however. Simply comparing cap hits doesn't take into account UFA/RFA status, a player's age, how large the salary cap was in the year in which the deal was signed, and whether teams were still able to circumvent the cap. As I previously showed with Kessel's contract, those factors can make a huge difference in a player's cap hit.

When you adjust for all these factors, Phaneuf's $7 million figure is nowhere close to the top earners. Below is a chart with the salaries for the defencemen with the largest adjusted cap hit. The cap hits for Chara, Kimmo Timonen, and Jay Bouwmeester are based on the contracts they signed when they first hit free agency, and when they were closer in age to Phaneuf is now.

For the methodologically inclined, I came up with the adjusted salaries by looking at cap hits as a percentage of the cap in the first year they were signed. For back-diving contracts, I used only the first eight years of the deal and calculated what those new cap hits looked like as a percentage. Finally, I added a premium to any RFA contract, which ended up being around $1.14 million, based on the difference in average cap hit percentage of the top UFA and RFA deals for the No. 1 defencemen in the league. It's not perfect, but it should be sufficient for our comparison.

NameAdjusted Salary*
Zdeno Chara$10.96m
Shea Weber$10.53m
Ryan Suter$9.16m
Duncan Keith$8.95m
Kris Letang$8.14m
Drew Doughty$8.14m
Brian Campbell$8.10m
Kimmo Timonen$8.09m
Alex Pietrangelo$7.64m
Erik Karlsson$7.64m
Dan Boyle$7.56m
Jay Bouwmeester$7.56m
Mike Green$7.22m
Brent Seabrook$6.94m
*Salary adjusted for what a player's contract would look like if signed as a UFA under the $64.3 million salary cap of 2013-14.

Considering contextual factors, Phaneuf's cap hit would actually be the 14th highest cap among defencemen, not the fifth. Because of salary inflation, $7 million doesn't buy you what it used to. Quick aside: The deal that paid Chara $7.5 million a season starting in 2006-07 looks crazy under today's salary cap... that is until you consider that it probably worked out better than any other UFA deal in NHL history

ESPN.com ranked Phaneuf in a tie for the 17th best defenceman in the NHL this summer, and although I might put him higher than one or two guys (namely, Keith Yandle), that's a pretty fair rating. He's a No. 1 defenceman, but an average one. So a $7 million cap hit would be perfectly fair for Phaneuf. Repeat, $7 million doesn't buy what it used to. Not when the salary cap has gone up; not when a player is hitting unrestricted free agency; and not when teams are unable to circumvent the cap.

And for the Leafs, there really isn't another option. Phaneuf handles the toughest defensive assignments for the Leafs, matching up against the opposition's top line on a nightly basis. In fact, so far this young season no defenceman has matched up as consistently against strong competition than Phaneuf, much like last season.

Phaneuf is also one of the rare defencemen who logs huge minutes on both the power play and penalty kill. Oliver Ekman-Larsson is the only other defenceman logging at least 3:30 on both special teams units.

There aren't any real options to replace him if Nonis decides $7 million is too rich. The only potential replacements in free agency are flawed, either because of age—Brooks Orpik, Stephane Robidas, Kimmo Timonen, Dan Boyle—or limited offensive upside—Dan Girardi. Plus, despite the influx of young defencemen in the Leafs' system, none are ready to step up and take over Phaneuf's minutes. Phaneuf may not be perfect, but the Leafs really can't afford to lose him.

7 comments:

Nick Abe, CFA said...

While I don't necessarily agree with your conclusion, let's assume $7mm is a fair deal. Fair deal and "good for the team" are two separate issues. The reality is that Leiwike and MLSE have been talking about making a cup winning team.

Cup Winners since the lockout:
Carolina - Rode Cam Ward without any "great" defencemen
Anaheim - Pronger/Niedermayer
Detroit - Lidstrom/Rafalski
Pittsburgh - Gonchar/Letang/Orpik
Chicago - Seabrook/Campbell/Keith
Boston - Chara/Seidenberg
LA - Doughty
Chicago - Seabrook/Keith

With the exception of possibly Carolina, the common theme is that this era Phaneuf would be at best a #2, usually #3 or #4 on any of those teams (again today's Phaneuf against say 2007's Niedermayer). While this doesn't necessarily have any bearing on his worth in the UFA market, it has to be concerning to a team like Toronto who wants to compete for the cup. It is simply going to be very difficult to spend $7mm on a guy that will need to be #2 or #3 on your depth chart in order for you to be successful in the playoffs.

Anonymous said...

Sorry to be a guest, but I just dont feel like registering for this,
but really?
Phaneuf is worse than Seidenberg, Gonchar, Orpik? You could say Keith and Lidstrom, sure, but I wouldnt agree with Seabrook or Rafalski either. You're vastly undervaluing a good defenseman.

Matt Horner said...

Nick, although I think you are undervaluing Phaneuf a bit (as anon above pointed out), your basic argument is definitely valid, as in "Can you win a Stanley Cup without an elite defenceman". Apart from Carolina the answer is no.

I am a Phaneuf fan, but he definitely isn't elite. But at the same time it's so incredibly hard to find an elite defenceman and if you don't re-sign Phaneuf you're getting rid of the one defenceman at least capable of being a No. 1 (albeit an average one). The Leafs are in a bit of a situation where they probably aren't in love with the idea of locking up Dion to a big deal, but it's the only option they have. I think they gotta hope a young guy like Morgan Rielly develops into an elite guy, and then you have Phaneuf as a #2 on a contending team.

moray watson said...

Phaneuf is worth signing at $7million for 7 years, as long as he doesn't have a no trade clause.

Nick Abe, CFA said...

I can agree with all that, but looking at the team we have so many guys that will end up with raises over the next few seasons. Kessel's cap hit goes up by 2.5mm next year. Raymond, Bolland, Gardiner, Rielly (if he becomes a #1 like you suggest), Franson, Kadri (maybe), all would need raises. In some cases substantial.

Paying Phaneuf 7 would mean that we would almost certainly lose a couple of those guys. Paying him, or someone else, 5.5 probably allows us to keep an extra one of the above.

So in my mind the question is more would you like a 5.5 type of guy and say Gardiner (total 8 let's say). Or would you rather Phaneuf plus pin your chances on another 1mm guy, which means we either get a great deal on a veteran or a young draft pick.

Amber Carl said...

All i want to tell is to thank you greatly for bringing up this complicated matter to open exchange of thoughts and conducting it so well. Great info calls for yet another visit to your website!
http://www.emmrautoauction.org |

marly aaran said...

Hello,I love reading through your blog, I wanted to leave a little comment to support you and wish you a good continuation. Wishing you the best of luck for all your blogging efforts. 
http://www.schmeckts-dir.net |

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...